Deviations in Artificial Intelligence and the absence of regulations regarding legal challenges in the era of digital revolution 5.0

Penyimpangan Artificial Intelligence dan kekosongan Regulasi mengenai tantangan Hukum di Era Revolusi Digital 5.0

Authors

  • Lely Zaidir Politeknik Pengayoman Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64272/1zgstn09

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, AI deviation, legal challenges, Digital Revolution 5.0

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the era of the Digital Revolution 5.0 has significantly transformed various aspects of social, economic, and legal life. AI is no longer merely a supporting tool but has evolved into an autonomous system capable of making decisions based on algorithms and large-scale data analysis. Despite its potential to enhance efficiency and innovation, the use of AI also gives rise to various forms of deviation, including privacy violations, algorithmic bias, digital disinformation, and automated decision-making processes that lack legal accountability. These challenges become more complex in the Indonesian context due to the absence of specific and comprehensive regulations governing AI governance and misuse. Although Indonesia has enacted general legal frameworks such as the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions and the Law on Personal Data Protection, these regulations do not adequately address the unique characteristics and risks associated with AI technologies. This study aims to analyze the forms of AI deviation in the Digital Revolution 5.0 era, identify regulatory gaps within Indonesia’s legal framework, and examine the legal challenges arising from the widespread implementation of AI systems. This research employs a normative juridical method with a comparative approach by analyzing national regulations and comparing them with the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act. The findings indicate that regulatory gaps may weaken legal certainty and the protection of human rights. Therefore, it is necessary to establish adaptive, risk-based AI regulations that balance public protection with the promotion of technological innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cajueiro, D. O. (2025). A comprehensive review of Artificial Intelligence regulation. ScienceDirect.

Fikri, A., & Amelia, T. (2024). Indonesia’s legal policy on protecting personal data from artificial intelligence abuse. SHS Conferences.

Hakimi, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence and legal reform in developing countries. Jurnal Undiknas.

Kudin, V. I., Kortukova, T., Dei, M., & Onyshchenko, A. (2024). Legal challenges of artificial intelligence in the European Union’s digital economy. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology.

Permata Sari, L., & Jannani, N. (2024). Urgensi regulasi artificial intelligence di Indonesia: Perspektif teori hukum responsif dan Sadd Al-Dzariah. Al-Balad: Journal of Constitutional Law.

European Commission. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Act: A risk-based approach to trustworthy AI. Official Journal of the European Union, 67(4), 10–27.

SSEK Law Firm. (2023). Ethical guidelines for AI development in Indonesia: A commentary on the Ministerial Circular No. 9/2023. Indonesia Legal Review, 4(3), 140–159.

Gumbo, L., & Booyse, N. (2024). Regulation of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 20(2), 139–156.

Goellner, S., Tropmann-Frick, M., & Brumen, B. (2024). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: A structured literature review. Journal of Responsible Technology, 7, 45–67.

Park, S. (2023). Bridging the global divide in AI regulation: A proposal for a contextual, coherent, and commensurable framework. Global Policy, 14(3), 213–232.

Alfiani, F. R. N., & Santiago, F. (2022). The important role of artificial intelligence technology regulation in protecting the public interest. Journal of Social Research, 3(7), 198–214.

Sulistyantoro, G. T., Khaq, A., Khan, M. Z. K., & Hussain, A.-M. (2024). Shaping artificial intelligence governance and risk management in the public sector: Regulatory insights. Lex Publica, 11(1), 261–284.

Kurniawan, M. J., & Purwanto, R. (2023). The revolution of public administration in the era of artificial intelligence: Legal challenges and constitutional implications. Fortiori Law Journal, 5(1), 89–112.

Rozaq Rois, N. A., & Nugroho, H. F. (2024). Personal data protection in the era of artificial intelligence: A critical review of Indonesia’s regulatory readiness based on OECD principles. Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics, 3(1), 50–72.

Rahman, R. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence regulation on labour market: Comparative perspectives on the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act in the Indonesian context. Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 101–128.

Mita, E. E., Gunadi, A., & Abdurrohim, M. (2023). Pengembangan regulasi penggunaan artificial intelligence pada bidang kesehatan di Indonesia: Aspek hukum dan etika. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(1), 67–89.

Tertibi, Y. (2024). The urgency of artificial intelligence regulation in Indonesia’s criminal justice. Metta: Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 5(3), 45–68.

Sari, D. P., & Rahmawati, L. (2025). Legal accountability of AI-based decision-making in financial technology. Indonesian Journal of Legal and Policy Studies, 10(2), 120–142.

Anderson, R., & Patel, J. (2023). Ethical risks and governance challenges in the deployment of autonomous systems. Journal of Ethics and Information Technology, 25(4), 355–373.

Hernandez, M. A., & Duarte, L. (2024). Algorithmic justice and human rights in AI regulation. International Review of Law and Technology, 9(1), 78–99.

Wijaya, D. N., & Prasetyo, A. W. (2023). Revisiting Indonesia’s digital law in the age of artificial intelligence. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(2), 211–234.

Barker, T., & Lewis, J. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence ethics and global governance: Towards a shared regulatory framework. Technology and Society Journal, 12(1), 65–87.

Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2020). Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.

Raji, I.D., et al. (2022). Towards Accountable Algorithms: Practical Approaches for Fairness and Transparency.

Lee, M., & Kelemen, J. (2023). Algorithmic Hiring and the Risk of Discrimination: Empirical Evidence.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2024). Social Data and Credit Scoring: Contextual Biases in AI Models.

Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2021). Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning.

Danks, D., & London, A.J. (2021). Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems.

Hernandez, R., & Duarte, S. (2024). AI Accountability in Public Sector Decision Making.

Hakimi, A. (2025). Hukum dan Kebijakan AI: Tantangan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas

Hernandez, M. A., & Duarte, L. (2024). Algorithmic justice and human rights in AI regulation. International Review of Law and Technology, 9(1), 78–99.

Kudin, V. I., Kortukova, T., Dei, M., & Onyshchenko, A. (2024). Legal challenges of artificial intelligence in the European Union’s digital economy. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 19(3), 211–229.

Fikri, A., & Amelia, T. (2024). Indonesia’s legal policy on protecting personal data from artificial intelligence abuse. SHS Web of Conferences, 180, 01012.

Goellner, S., Tropmann-Frick, M., & Brumen, B. (2024). Responsible artificial intelligence: A structured literature review. Journal of Responsible Technology, 7, 45–67.

Hakimi, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence and legal reform in developing countries. Jurnal Undiknas, 12(1), 23–41.

Cajueiro, D. O. (2025). A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence regulation. ScienceDirect.

Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Vintage Books.

Wiguna, I. K. A., & Aisyah, N. (2025).

Penyalahgunaan teknologi deepfake dalam kejahatan siber pornografi: Tantangan hukum dan perlindungan korban di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Siber dan Teknologi Digital, 4(1), 55–72.

Downloads

Published

28-03-2026