Research With Incarcerated Youth in Indonesia: Methodological Considerations and Best Practices
Penelitian Dengan Anak Binaan Di Indonesia: Pertimbangan Metodologis Dan Praktik Terbaik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64272/nbvw3b22Keywords:
Incarcerated youth; research ethics; methodological considerations; Juvenile Correctional Center; Indonesia, Anak Binaan; etika penelitian; pertimbangan metodologis; Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus AnakAbstract
Research involving incarcerated youth in Indonesia requires careful attention to both ethical and methodological considerations due to the dual vulnerabilities of this population: as minors and detainees within the correctional system. This qualitative study explores the ethical challenges faced by researchers in designing, collecting, and presenting data, with a focus on empowering and involving incarcerated youth throughout the research process. The study uses an instrumental case study within an action research design, incorporating reflective practices and collaboration with both the youth participants and correctional staff. Purposive sampling was employed to select participants from a Juvenile Correctional Facility (LPKA) in West Sumatra, Indonesia, including male youths (n=74) aged 14–19 and relevant stakeholders such as correctional officers. This participatory approach allowed youth to be actively engaged in all stages of the research, from the design to the data collection and analysis. The article highlights the need of research frameworks such as emancipatory pedagogy, empowerment theory, the transformative paradigm, and Positive Youth Development (PYD) to guide the research process, ensuring that ethical relationships are maintained and power imbalances are minimized. The findings emphasize the importance of social justice, reflexivity, and collaboration in research with vulnerable populations. Also, the findings show the needs of incarcerated youth take a central position when researching within juvenile correctional facilities. This paper contributes to the discourse on ethical research with incarcerated youth in Indonesia and advocates for justice-oriented methodologies that foster social change while respecting participants' autonomy and dignity. In doing so, research becomes not only a means of generating knowledge but also a catalyst for meaningful social change.
Downloads
References
Abrams, Laura S. “Envisioning Life ‘On the Outs’: Exit Narratives of Incarcerated Male Youth.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 56, no. 6 (2012): 877–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11415042.
Abrams, Laura S. “Sampling ‘Hard to Reach’ Populations in Qualitative Research: The Case of Incarcerated Youth.” Qualitative Social Work 9, no. 4 (2010): 536–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010367821.
Adams, Tony E., Stacy Linn Holman Jones, and Carolyn Ellis. Autoethnography. Oxford University Press, 2015.
Aldridge, Jo. Participatory Research: Working with Vulnerable Groups in Research and Practice. Policy Press, 2015.
Baltodano, Heather M, Derrick Platt, and Christopher W Roberts. “Transition from Secure Care to the Community: Significant Issues for Youth in Detention.” The Journal of Correctional Education 56, no. 4 (2005): 372–88.
Beal, Catherine. “Insider Accounts of the Move to the Outside: Two Young People Talk about Their Transitions from Secure Institutions.” Youth Justice 14, no. 1 (2014): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225413520362.
Benson, Peter L., Peter C. Scales, Stephen F. Hamilton, and Arturo Sesma. “Positive Youth Development: Theory, Research, and Applications.” In Handbook of Child Psychology, 1st ed., edited by William Damon and Richard M. Lerner. Wiley, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0116.
Biklen, Sari Knopp, and Ronnie Casella. A Practical Guide to the Qualitative Dissertation. Teachers College Press, 2007.
Bradbury, Hilary, ed. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Edited by Hilary Bradbury. Third edition. SAGE Publications, 2015.
BRIN. “BRIN Prosedur Klirens Etik.” Prosedur Klirens Etik, April 10, 2025. https://klirensetik.brin.go.id/prosedur.
Bullis, Michael, Paul Yovanoff, Gina Mueller, and Emily Havel. “Life on the ‘Outs’—Examination of the Facility-to-Community Transition of Incarcerated Youth.” Exceptional Children 69, no. 1 (2002): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206900101.
Burkhard, Brian M., Kathleen M. Robinson, Elise D. Murray, and Richard M. Lerner. “Positive Youth Development: Theory and Perspective.” In The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, 1st ed., edited by Stephen Hupp and Jeremy Jewell. Wiley, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad310.
Caringi, J.C. “Promoting Youth Voice in Indian Country.” In Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 35. no. 8. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.04.006.
Clemmer, D. The Prison Community. The Prison Community. Christopher Publishing House, 1940.
Conrad, D. “Youth Participatory Action Research and Applied Theatre Engagement: Supporting Indigenous Youth Survivance and Resurgence.” In Theatre Research in Canada-Recherches Theatrales Au Canada, vol. 41. no. 2. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3138/tric.41.2.a04.
Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Fourth edition. SAGE, 2018.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Fifth edition. SAGE, 2018.
Desai, Shiv R. “‘Hurt People, Hurt People’: The Trauma of Juvenile Incarceration.” The Urban Review 51, no. 4 (2019): 638–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00535-0.
Ellis, Carolyn. “Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research With Intimate Others.” Qualitative Inquiry 13, no. 1 (2007): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947.
Fitri Z, Yenny, and Nedi Rinaldi. “Transformasi Penanganan Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Di LPKA Klas II Tanjung Pati.” Ensiklopedia Social Review 1, no. 2 (2019): 164–71.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 2nd Vintage Books ed. Vintage Books, 1995.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Repr. Bloomsbury, 2012.
Garcia, A. “Engaging Homeless Youth in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Case Study from Skid Row, Los Angeles.” In Health Promotion Practice, vol. 15. no. 1. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912472904.
Goffman, Erving. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. 1. Anchor Books ed. Anchor Books. Anchor Books, 1990.
Grace, R. “Where Are the Silences? A Scoping Review of Child Participatory Research Literature in the Context of the Australian Service System.” In Children Australia, vol. 44. no. 4. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2019.32.
Haskie-Mendoza, S. “Conducting Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) through a Healing-Informed Approach with System-Involved Latinas.” In Journal of Family Violence, vol. 33. no. 8. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9996-x.
James, Nalita. “Research on the ‘Inside’: The Challenges of Conducting Research with Young Offenders.” Sociological Research Online 18, no. 4 (2013): 138–47. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3129.
Javdani, Shabnam, Sukhmani Singh, and Corianna E. Sichel. “Negotiating Ethical Paradoxes in Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial: Aligning Intervention Science with Participatory Values.” American Journal of Community Psychology 60, nos. 3–4 (2017): 439–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12185.
Kemmis, Stephen, Robin McTaggart, and Rhonda Nixon. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer Singapore, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2.
KPPPA. Laporan Pelaksanaan SPPA Tahun 2022 Pusat. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2023.
Larkins, C. “‘If Rich People Gave More Money to Poor People’: Young People’s Perspectives on Reducing Offending and Implications for Social Citizenship.” In Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 110. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104702.
Leavy, Patricia. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Second Edition. The Guilford Press, 2023.
Lerner, Richard M. “The Positive Youth Development Perspective: Theoretical and Empirical Bases of a Strengths-Based Approach to Adolescent Development.” In Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2nd Ed. Oxford Library of Psychology. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Lerner, Richard M., Jason B. Almerigi, Christina Theokas, and Jacqueline V. Lerner. “Positive Youth Development A View of the Issues.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 25, no. 1 (2005): 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604273211.
Lestari, Mutiara Ayu, and Meilanny Budiarti Santoso. “Penguatan Karakter Pada Remaja Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak (LPKA).” Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 6, no. 3 (2020): 297. https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v6i3.23026.
Mathur, Sarup R., Heather Griller Clark, Rebecca I. Hartzell, Leslie LaCroix, and Terrence S. McTier. “What Youth With Special Needs in Juvenile Justice Say About Reentry: Listening to Their Voice.” Youth & Society 52, no. 8 (2020): 1501–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19826423.
McDaniel, Sara C., and Coddy Carter. “Transition Programming for Youth with Persistent Delinquent Histories: A Descriptive Case Example.” Residential Treatment for Children & Youth 36, no. 3 (2019): 178–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2018.1517627.
Mertens, Donna M. Mixed Methods Research: Research Methods. Bloomsbury Research Methods. Bloomsbury Academic, 2023.
Mertens, Donna M. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology : Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2010.
Miles, Matthew B., A. M. Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Third edition. SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014.
Miller, Alexandra A., and William J. Therrien. “Returning Home: Reducing Recidivism for Juvenile Offenders With Disabilities Through Transition Planning.” Beyond Behavior 27, no. 2 (2018): 108–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618766517.
Moore, Linda Weaver, and Margaret Miller. “Initiating Research with Doubly Vulnerable Populations.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 30, no. 5 (1999): 1034–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01205.x.
Mountz, S. “Remapping Pipelines and Pathways: Listening to Queer and Transgender Youth of Color’s Trajectories through Girls’ Juvenile Justice Facilities.” In Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work, vol. 35. no. 2. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919880517.
Rappaport, Julian. “Studies in Empowerment: Introduction to the Issue.” Prevention in Human Services 3, nos. 2–3 (1984): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1300/J293v03n02_02.
Ratomi, Achmad. “Penyelesaian Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Dalam Konteks Sosial Masyarakat (Penghindaran Labeling Terhadap Anak).” Journal de Jure 5, no. 2 (2013): 134–45. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v5i2.3004.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2012, No. 153. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta., 2012.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2022, No. 165. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta., 2022.
Saiz-Linares, Á. “#MakeYourYouthRing: Participatory Qualitative Research with Young People at Risk of Exclusion.” In Qualitative Report, vol. 27. no. 9. 2022. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5525.
Shafi, Adeela Ahmed. “Researching Young Offenders: Navigating Methodological Challenges and Reframing Ethical Responsibilities.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 43, no. 1 (2020): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1529746.
Shier, Harry. “An Analytical Tool to Help Researchers Develop Partnerships with Children and Adolescents.” In Participatory Methodologies to Elevate Children’s Voice and Agency, edited by Ilene R Berson, Michael J Berson, and Colette Gray. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2019.
Sykes, Gresham M. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton University Press, 1958.
Umamaheswar, Janani. “Studying Homeless and Incarcerated Persons: A Comparative Account of Doing Field Research With Hard-to-Reach Populations.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research Vol 19 (September 2018): No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3053.
Wainwright, J. “Race, Ethnicity, Young People and Offending: The Elephant in the Room.” In Social Identities, vol. 26. no. 1. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2019.1684887.
Waldram, James B. “Anthropology in Prison: Negotiating Consent and Accountability with a ‘captured’ Population.” Human Organization 57, no. 2 (1998): 238–44. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.57.2.k204675w44u27473.
Washington, Aryssa, and Lee A Underwood. “Structuring a Self-Regulated Juvenile Justice System to Treat Youth Offenders.” Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis 3, no. 3 (2016): 1033.
Yorke, L. “Advances and Challenges in Participatory Research with Vulnerable Children in Ireland.” In Irish Journal of Psychology, vol. 33. no. 2. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2012.706796.
Yuliyanto, Yuliyanto. “Pembinaan Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas II Bandung.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 1 (2020): 103. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.103-116.
Yustrisia, Lola, and Desy Septia Kardiyah. “Pelaksanaan Hak Anak Pidana Untuk Mendapatkan Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Klas II Tanjung Pati.” Pagaruyuang Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2019): 181–99.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 William Maxey, Hari Harjanto Setiawan, Sri Setiawati, Rudi Febriamansyah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
